NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+648%
2.304 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
308.0 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
N10E-GT
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
