NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1300MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
+131%
5.325 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
398
Arc Pro A60M
+187%
1144
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-256
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
