NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2250MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+708%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
40
896
Shading Units
5120
56
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
AD104
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
