NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1590MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+470%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Oland
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
