NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Moore Threads MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 255W)
Moore Threads MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
MTT S80
+417%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
255W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
