NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+7205%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT218
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
