NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+7%
2.849 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1600
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cypress
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
