NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD FirePro RG220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+3461%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
80
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
M93
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
