NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV380
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-
