NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1650MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
+166%
7.603 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
527
CMP 40HX
+122%
1174
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
36
896
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
185W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU106
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
