NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1594MHz vs 1291MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+62%
1.983 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+108%
2212
GeForce MX330
1060
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+706%
1016
GeForce MX330
126
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 10 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1152 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
61.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
30.98 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
1.983 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
61.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GP108
N17P-G1-A1
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
