NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GP107
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 GP107 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GP107 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1532MHz vs 1291MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+68%
1.983 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150 GP107
1.177 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+202%
278
GeForce MX150 GP107
92
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Feb 2019
GeForce 10 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1152 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
61.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
30.98 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
1.983 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
61.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GP107
N17P-G1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
