NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
2.332 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
+41%
3.297 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2018
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Tonga
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
5 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
