Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
0.601 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +2006%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
192
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
Vega 10
GF116-200-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

106W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy