Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 360M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 360M
0.276 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q +2139%
6.18 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 300M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
20
96
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
275.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GA107
N11E-GS1-A3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net