NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Sky 700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 6GB VRAM Radeon Sky 700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Sky 700 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon Sky 700
+788%
3.226 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Sky
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
