NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+4241%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
32
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
31.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
31.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD103
GT 755M
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
