Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +165%
1.997 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 700M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
31.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
31.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT 755M
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net