NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+973%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD107
GT 755M
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
