NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 740 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 's Advantages
Lower TDP (64W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 740
0.763 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
+291%
2.984 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 740
516
GeForce GTX 1650
+591%
3566
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 740
182
GeForce GTX 1650
+782%
1606
Graphics Card
May 2014
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
762.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
64W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU117
GK107-425-A2
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
