NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 740 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
64 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 740
+73%
0.763 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
762.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
64W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
R600
GK107-425-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
