NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs ATI FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (49W vs 89W)
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 620
+40%
0.269 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
120
16
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
49W
TDP
89W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
RV630
GF108-100-KB-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
