NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 49W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 620
0.269 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+1042%
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 620
93
Arc A350
+3382%
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 620
55
Arc A350
+2592%
1481
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 600
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF108-100-KB-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
