NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 610 PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 610 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
+669%
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
29W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
RV770
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
