NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520M
0.142 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+6195%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 500M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
24
48
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
5.920 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
142.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
11.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
12W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
AD107
N12P-GV-B-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
