NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 21.34GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
0.311 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+3758%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
21.34GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
22
96
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
311.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
AD107
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
