NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II
+5137%
14.09 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
Vega 20
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
