NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+649%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 400
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1440
16
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
Cypress
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
