NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430 OEM
0.269 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+6294%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
DG2-512
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
