NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (43W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+185%
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
27
72
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
GT200
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
