NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
+4168%
10.97 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 240
423
TITAN X Pascal
+2227%
9844
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Aug 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
28
96
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
GP102
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
