NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+6911%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
