NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+1300%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 100
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.02GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1440
24
TMUs
72
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
