NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+594%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 100
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.02GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
12
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
