NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+2318%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 100
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
38.02GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
