NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1379MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 83W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 16.80GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2018
Release Date
Jul 2005
GeForce 10
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1152 MHz
Base Clock
-
1379 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1050 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.80GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
33.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
16.55 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1059 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
33.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
83W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
NV41
GP108-310-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Curie
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
