Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
16 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1650 AGP 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2009
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV530
GT218-200-B1
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy