Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.34GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +15337%
12.35 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 9M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.34GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
24
32
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
AD107
NB9P-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net