NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GT
+550%
0.208 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
RV620
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
