NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
More VRAM (384GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 84W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO
+725%
0.264 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
384MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
12
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
26.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
264.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
84W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
