NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
T400
+601%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
6
48
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
156.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
90W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
TU117
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
