NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+1869%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 9
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
156.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
90W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
DG2-128
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
