Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +10595%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 9
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy