NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
+877%
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 9
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
