NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
A2
+9968%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
10
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
Unknown
121 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
