NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (16W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1455MHz vs 993MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+1659%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
256
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
AD107
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
