NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock993MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (16W vs 30W)
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
+32%
0.508 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 900M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
-
993 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
16W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
RV730
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.514 billion
Unknown
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
