NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1335MHz vs 993MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+707%
4.101 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 920MX
382
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1201%
4973
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce 920MX
108
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+2033%
2304
Blender
GeForce 920MX
47
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1751%
870
OctaneBench
GeForce 920MX
10
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1010%
111
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
256
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
TU116
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
