NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD FirePro M3100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (993MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
AMD FirePro M3100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
FirePro M3100
+5%
0.537 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
537.6 GFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
16W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
Mars
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
