NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs Intel Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (16W vs 25W)
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1150MHz vs 993MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
+247%
1.766 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 920MX
382
Arc A350M
+619%
2749
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce 920MX
108
Arc A350M
+1137%
1336
Blender
GeForce 920MX
47
Arc A350M
+734%
392
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 900M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
DG2-128
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
